Explore Other Theoretical Frameworks

Oct 13, 2025 by talynt.org 79 views

The Role of Pancasila Youth in Supporting the Nomination of Regional Heads: A Study of the Victory of Pangonal Harahap and Andi Suhaimi Dalimunte as Regent and Deputy Regent of Labuhan Batu 2015

Introduction

The 2015 Labuhan Batu Pilkada was a significant event in the history of Indonesian politics, marking a turning point in the role of social organizations in influencing the results of elections. Among these organizations, the Pancasila Youth (Pemuda Pancasila) played a crucial role in supporting the nomination of the pair Pangonal Harahap and Andi Suhaimi Dalimunte. This study aims to analyze the active role of MPC Pemuda Pancasila Labuhan Batu in supporting the nomination of the pair, and to examine the strategies employed by the organization to achieve its goals.

Theoretical Framework

This study is based on the theory of political elite, power theory, and local patronage theory. The theory of political elite suggests that power is concentrated in the hands of a few individuals or groups who hold significant influence over the political process. Power theory, on the other hand, emphasizes the importance of power in shaping the behavior of individuals and groups. Local patronage theory, which is relevant to this study, suggests that patronage relationships between individuals and groups can be a powerful tool for achieving political goals.

Methodology

This study uses qualitative methods, including in-depth interviews and literature studies, to examine the role of MPC Pemuda Pancasila in the campaign. The data collected from these methods were analyzed using typological techniques to identify patterns and themes.

Mobilization and Patronage Strategies

Pemuda Pancasila Labuhan Batu utilized its social network to mobilize members and sympathizers to support the candidate pair Pangonal Harahap and Andi Suhaimi Dalimunte. The organization employed various strategies to achieve this goal, including:

Mass Mobilization: Pemuda Pancasila Labuhan Batu organized mass rallies and demonstrations to mobilize support for the candidate pair.
Social Network: The organization leveraged its social network to spread political messages and build support for the candidate pair.
Patronage: Pemuda Pancasila Labuhan Batu provided social assistance, such as the distribution of food, to build close relations with the community and build a strong support base.

Patronage Effect

The success of Pemuda Pancasila Labuhan Batu in directing community support for the candidate pair was associated with the patronage strategy they employed. By providing social assistance and building close relations with the community, the organization was able to build a strong support base for the candidate pair.

Political Power

The involvement of Pemuda Pancasila Labuhan Batu in the campaign was not limited to mass mobilization. The organization also acted as a "bodyguard" and "supervisor" in the election process, reducing the potential for election fraud and ensuring a smooth campaign.

Coercive Patronage Model

Further analysis showed that the form of coercive patronage carried out by Pemuda Pancasila Labuhan Batu was a key factor in its success. Through its strength and influence, the organization was able to force individuals to submit to leadership and carry out the commands given.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that Pemuda Pancasila Labuhan Batu played an important role in the victory of the pair of Pangonal Harahap and Andi Suhaimi Dalimunte in the 2015 Labuhan Batu Pilkada. Through mass mobilization, social network, and patronage, the organization was able to become an influential political force in determining the results of the election. This research provides an overview of how social organizations can be a determining factor in the political process in Indonesia.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Social Organizations: Social organizations, such as Pemuda Pancasila, should continue to play an active role in supporting the nomination of regional heads.
Patronage Strategy: Patronage strategy should be employed by social organizations to build close relations with the community and build a strong support base.
Mass Mobilization: Mass mobilization should be used by social organizations to mobilize support for the candidate pair.
Political Power: Social organizations should continue to act as a "bodyguard" and "supervisor" in the election process to reduce the potential for election fraud.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, including:

Case Study: This study is a case study of the 2015 Labuhan Batu Pilkada, and the findings may not be generalizable to other elections.
Data Collection: The data collected for this study were limited to in-depth interviews and literature studies, and may not be representative of the entire population.
Theoretical Framework: The theoretical framework used in this study is based on the theory of political elite, power theory, and local patronage theory, and may not be applicable to other contexts.

Future Research

Future research should aim to:

Generalize the Findings: Future research should aim to generalize the findings of this study to other elections and contexts.
Explore Other Theoretical Frameworks: Future research should explore other theoretical frameworks that may be relevant to the study of social organizations and patronage.
Collect More Data: Future research should collect more data to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the role of social organizations in supporting the nomination of regional heads.
Q&A: The Role of Pancasila Youth in Supporting the Nomination of Regional Heads

Q: What is the Pancasila Youth and what is its role in Indonesian politics?

A: The Pancasila Youth (Pemuda Pancasila) is a social organization in Indonesia that plays a significant role in supporting the nomination of regional heads. The organization is known for its mass mobilization and patronage strategies, which have been instrumental in shaping the outcome of elections in Indonesia.

Q: What was the significance of the 2015 Labuhan Batu Pilkada?

A: The 2015 Labuhan Batu Pilkada was a significant event in Indonesian politics, marking a turning point in the role of social organizations in influencing the results of elections. The election saw the victory of the pair Pangonal Harahap and Andi Suhaimi Dalimunte, who were supported by the Pancasila Youth.

Q: What strategies did the Pancasila Youth employ to support the nomination of the pair?

A: The Pancasila Youth employed various strategies to support the nomination of the pair, including mass mobilization, social network, and patronage. The organization organized mass rallies and demonstrations to mobilize support for the candidate pair, leveraged its social network to spread political messages and build support, and provided social assistance to build close relations with the community.

Q: What is the patronage effect and how did it contribute to the victory of the pair?

A: The patronage effect refers to the influence that social organizations, such as the Pancasila Youth, have on the community through their provision of social assistance and other forms of support. The patronage effect was a key factor in the victory of the pair, as it helped to build a strong support base among the community.

Q: What is the coercive patronage model and how did it contribute to the victory of the pair?

A: The coercive patronage model refers to the use of power and influence by social organizations, such as the Pancasila Youth, to force individuals to submit to leadership and carry out the commands given. The coercive patronage model was a key factor in the victory of the pair, as it helped to ensure that the community supported the candidate pair.

Q: What are the implications of this study for the role of social organizations in Indonesian politics?

A: This study highlights the significant role that social organizations, such as the Pancasila Youth, play in shaping the outcome of elections in Indonesia. The study suggests that social organizations can be a determining factor in the political process, and that their influence should not be underestimated.

Q: What are the limitations of this study and what are the areas for future research?

A: This study has several limitations, including the case study design and the limited data collection methods used. Future research should aim to generalize the findings of this study to other elections and contexts, explore other theoretical frameworks that may be relevant to the study of social organizations and patronage, and collect more data to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the role of social organizations in supporting the nomination of regional heads.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study for social organizations and policymakers?

A: This study recommends that social organizations, such as the Pancasila Youth, continue to play an active role in supporting the nomination of regional heads. The study also recommends that policymakers take into account the influence of social organizations in shaping the outcome of elections and develop strategies to address the potential negative consequences of their influence.

Q: What are the implications of this study for the future of Indonesian politics?

A: This study highlights the significant role that social organizations, such as the Pancasila Youth, play in shaping the outcome of elections in Indonesia. The study suggests that social organizations will continue to play a significant role in Indonesian politics, and that their influence should be taken into account by policymakers and other stakeholders.