Introducing Customizable Page Sizes

Oct 13, 2025 by talynt.org 131 views

Improving Tester's Efficiency with Customizable Page Sizes

In the pursuit of optimizing testing processes, it is essential to consider the intricacies of data retrieval and processing. The Tester, a crucial component in the testing workflow, has been identified as a bottleneck in certain scenarios. Specifically, when attempting to download pull requests, Tester's inability to accept a page size argument has resulted in timeouts. This limitation can be circumvented by introducing customizable page sizes, which is the focus of this article.

The Issue with Tester's Current Implementation

The Tester's current design does not accommodate the specification of a page size, leading to inefficient data retrieval and processing. This is particularly evident when dealing with large datasets, such as those encountered during pull request downloads. The inability to control the page size results in Tester attempting to download an excessive amount of data, causing timeouts and hindering the testing process.

Introducing Customizable Page Sizes

To address this issue, it is proposed that Tester be modified to accept two new arguments: --pull-page-size and --issue-page-size. These arguments would enable users to specify the desired page size for pull requests and issues, respectively. This customization would allow users to tailor the testing process to their specific needs, ensuring that data retrieval and processing are optimized.

Modifying Workflows to Accept Page Size Inputs

In addition to modifying Tester to accept page size arguments, it is also necessary to update the relevant workflows to accommodate these inputs. Specifically, the test-pulls.yml and test-issues.yml workflows would need to be modified to accept page_size inputs and pass them through to Tester. This would ensure that the specified page size is applied during the testing process.

Updating the `train.yml` Workflow

The train.yml workflow would also require modifications to accept the page_size inputs and pass them through to Tester. However, it is essential to note that the train.yml workflow may be subject to the maximum inputs limit. If this limit is reached, alternative solutions would need to be explored to accommodate the additional inputs.

Benefits of Customizable Page Sizes

The introduction of customizable page sizes would have several benefits, including:

Improved Efficiency: By allowing users to specify the desired page size, Tester can retrieve and process data more efficiently, reducing the likelihood of timeouts and improving overall testing performance.
Increased Flexibility: Customizable page sizes would provide users with greater flexibility in tailoring the testing process to their specific needs, enabling them to optimize data retrieval and processing for their unique requirements.
Enhanced User Experience: By providing users with more control over the testing process, customizable page sizes would contribute to a more streamlined and user-friendly experience.

Conclusion

Q: What is the current issue with Tester's implementation?

A: The current issue with Tester's implementation is that it does not accept a page size argument, leading to inefficient data retrieval and processing, particularly when dealing with large datasets such as pull requests.

Q: Why is it necessary to introduce customizable page sizes?

A: Introducing customizable page sizes is necessary to enable users to tailor the testing process to their specific needs, ensuring that data retrieval and processing are optimized. This would lead to improved testing performance, increased flexibility, and an enhanced user experience.

Q: What are the proposed modifications to Tester?

A: The proposed modifications to Tester include accepting two new arguments: --pull-page-size and --issue-page-size. These arguments would enable users to specify the desired page size for pull requests and issues, respectively.

Q: How would the relevant workflows be modified to accept page size inputs?

A: The test-pulls.yml and test-issues.yml workflows would need to be modified to accept page_size inputs and pass them through to Tester. The train.yml workflow would also require modifications to accept the page_size inputs and pass them through to Tester, unless it hits the maximum inputs limit.

Q: What are the benefits of customizable page sizes?

A: The benefits of customizable page sizes include:

Improved Efficiency: By allowing users to specify the desired page size, Tester can retrieve and process data more efficiently, reducing the likelihood of timeouts and improving overall testing performance.
Increased Flexibility: Customizable page sizes would provide users with greater flexibility in tailoring the testing process to their specific needs, enabling them to optimize data retrieval and processing for their unique requirements.
Enhanced User Experience: By providing users with more control over the testing process, customizable page sizes would contribute to a more streamlined and user-friendly experience.

Q: What are the potential limitations of introducing customizable page sizes?

A: The potential limitations of introducing customizable page sizes include:

Increased Complexity: Introducing customizable page sizes may add complexity to the testing process, potentially leading to increased maintenance and support requirements.
Maximum Inputs Limit: The train.yml workflow may be subject to the maximum inputs limit, which could limit the number of page size inputs that can be accepted.

Q: How can users implement customizable page sizes in their testing process?

A: Users can implement customizable page sizes in their testing process by:

Specifying the desired page size: Users can specify the desired page size using the --pull-page-size and --issue-page-size arguments.
Modifying the relevant workflows: Users would need to modify the test-pulls.yml and test-issues.yml workflows to accept page_size inputs and pass them through to Tester.
Updating the train.yml workflow: Users would need to update the train.yml workflow to accept the page_size inputs and pass them through to Tester, unless it hits the maximum inputs limit.

Q: What is the expected outcome of introducing customizable page sizes?

A: The expected outcome of introducing customizable page sizes is improved testing performance, increased flexibility, and an enhanced user experience. By providing users with more control over the testing process, customizable page sizes would contribute to a more streamlined and user-friendly experience.