Juridical Review Implementation of the Profit Sharing Agreement for Venture Capital Companies and Business Pair Companies

Oct 13, 2025 by talynt.org 95 views

Juridical Review Implementation of the Profit Sharing Agreement for Venture Capital Companies and Business Pair Companies

Introduction

In the realm of business and finance, venture capital companies (PMV) play a crucial role in supporting the growth and development of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). However, MSMEs often face difficulties in accessing credit from banks due to their lack of legal entity status. To overcome this challenge, PMV offers an interesting solution through a financing agreement with a profit-sharing pattern. This agreement is typically made before a notary, with predetermined contents that include the determination of rewards for profit-sharing services to the business pair company (PPU). In this article, we will delve into the juridical review implementation of the profit-sharing agreement for PMV and PPU, exploring the form of agreement, the position of the two parties, and the way of completing defaults that may occur.

Background

The profit-sharing agreement between PMV and PPU is a crucial aspect of their partnership. This agreement is usually made before a notary, with the contents predetermined by PMV. The agreement outlines the terms and conditions of the partnership, including the determination of rewards for profit-sharing services to PPU. The profit-sharing agreement is a key component of the partnership between PMV and PPU, and it is essential to understand the juridical implications of this agreement.

Methodology

This study uses a normative juridical method with an analytical descriptive approach and qualitative data analysis. The study examines the agreement between PMV and PPU, including the form of agreement, the position of the two parties, and the way of completing defaults that may occur. The study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the juridical review implementation of the profit-sharing agreement for PMV and PPU.

Results

The results of the study showed that the agreement between PMV and PPU was generally in the form of a notary deed whose contents had been predetermined by PMV. The deed was signed by both parties before the notary, which places PMV in a higher position than PPU. The study also found that the problem that often arises in this agreement is the default carried out by PPU. In practice, PMV prefers completion by rescue, which includes Restructuring, reconditioning, rescheduling, and injection. This method is considered more effective and efficient compared to take over, sales of company assets, offsetting, and legal action.

Discussion

The study suggests that PMV increase the amount of equity so that the burden of services rewards to PPU can be reduced. This is because the current profit-sharing agreement places a significant burden on PPU, which can lead to financial difficulties. Furthermore, the study recommends that the government pay more attention to the regulation of venture capital practices in Indonesia. Until now, there is no specific regulation that regulates venture capital, which can create uncertainty and hinder economic growth.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the juridical review implementation of the profit-sharing agreement for PMV and PPU is a crucial aspect of their partnership. The study highlights the importance of understanding the form of agreement, the position of the two parties, and the way of completing defaults that may occur. The study suggests that PMV increase the amount of equity and that the government pay more attention to the regulation of venture capital practices in Indonesia. By doing so, the partnership between PMV and PPU can be strengthened, and the national economy can benefit from increased economic growth.

Recommendations

Based on the study, the following recommendations are made:

PMV should increase the amount of equity to reduce the burden of services rewards to PPU.
The government should pay more attention to the regulation of venture capital practices in Indonesia.
The government should establish specific regulations that regulate venture capital to provide legal certainty and encourage economic growth.

Limitations

The study has several limitations, including:

The study only examines the agreement between PMV and PPU and does not consider other aspects of their partnership.
The study relies on qualitative data analysis, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the juridical review implementation of the profit-sharing agreement.
The study does not consider the impact of the profit-sharing agreement on the national economy.

Future Research Directions

Future research directions include:

Examining the impact of the profit-sharing agreement on the national economy.
Investigating the role of the government in regulating venture capital practices in Indonesia.
Conducting a comprehensive analysis of the juridical review implementation of the profit-sharing agreement for PMV and PPU.

References

[1] [List of references]

Appendices

[List of appendices]

Glossary

[List of glossary]

Index

[List of index]

Abstract

This study examines the juridical review implementation of the profit-sharing agreement for venture capital companies (PMV) and business pair companies (PPU). The study uses a normative juridical method with an analytical descriptive approach and qualitative data analysis. The results show that the agreement between PMV and PPU was generally in the form of a notary deed whose contents had been predetermined by PMV. The study also found that the problem that often arises in this agreement is the default carried out by PPU. The study suggests that PMV increase the amount of equity and that the government pay more attention to the regulation of venture capital practices in Indonesia.
Q&A: Juridical Review Implementation of the Profit Sharing Agreement for Venture Capital Companies and Business Pair Companies

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the purpose of the profit-sharing agreement between PMV and PPU?

A: The profit-sharing agreement between PMV and PPU is a crucial aspect of their partnership. The agreement outlines the terms and conditions of the partnership, including the determination of rewards for profit-sharing services to PPU.

Q: What is the form of the profit-sharing agreement between PMV and PPU?

A: The profit-sharing agreement between PMV and PPU is generally in the form of a notary deed whose contents have been predetermined by PMV.

Q: What is the position of PMV and PPU in the profit-sharing agreement?

A: The study found that PMV is in a higher position than PPU in the profit-sharing agreement.

Q: What is the problem that often arises in the profit-sharing agreement between PMV and PPU?

A: The problem that often arises in this agreement is the default carried out by PPU.

Q: What is the preferred method of completing defaults by PMV?

A: In practice, PMV prefers completion by rescue, which includes Restructuring, reconditioning, rescheduling, and injection.

Q: What is the recommendation of the study for PMV?

A: The study suggests that PMV increase the amount of equity so that the burden of services rewards to PPU can be reduced.

Q: What is the recommendation of the study for the government?

A: The study recommends that the government pay more attention to the regulation of venture capital practices in Indonesia.

Q: Why is it important to regulate venture capital practices in Indonesia?

A: Regulating venture capital practices in Indonesia can provide legal certainty and encourage economic growth.

Q: What are the benefits of a more conducive investment climate for PMV and MSMEs?

A: A more conducive investment climate for PMV and MSMEs can strengthen synergy and collaboration between the two parties in advancing the national economy.

Q: What are the limitations of the study?

A: The study has several limitations, including the reliance on qualitative data analysis and the lack of consideration of other aspects of the partnership between PMV and PPU.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research directions include examining the impact of the profit-sharing agreement on the national economy, investigating the role of the government in regulating venture capital practices in Indonesia, and conducting a comprehensive analysis of the juridical review implementation of the profit-sharing agreement for PMV and PPU.

Additional Questions and Answers

Q: What is the role of the notary in the profit-sharing agreement between PMV and PPU?

A: The notary plays a crucial role in the profit-sharing agreement between PMV and PPU by witnessing the signing of the agreement and ensuring that the contents of the agreement are in accordance with the law.

Q: What are the consequences of default by PPU?

A: The consequences of default by PPU can include financial difficulties, damage to reputation, and loss of business opportunities.

Q: How can PMV reduce the burden of services rewards to PPU?

A: PMV can reduce the burden of services rewards to PPU by increasing the amount of equity and providing more favorable terms and conditions in the profit-sharing agreement.

Q: What are the benefits of a more favorable profit-sharing agreement for PPU?

A: A more favorable profit-sharing agreement for PPU can provide greater financial security, improved reputation, and increased business opportunities.

Conclusion

The profit-sharing agreement between PMV and PPU is a crucial aspect of their partnership. Understanding the form of the agreement, the position of the two parties, and the way of completing defaults that may occur is essential for the success of the partnership. The study highlights the importance of regulating venture capital practices in Indonesia and provides recommendations for PMV and the government to strengthen synergy and collaboration between the two parties in advancing the national economy.