Study of the Effectiveness of the Use of Volcanic Ash and Rice Husk Ash on Clay Stability in Terms of CBR Values and Unconfined Compression Tests

Oct 13, 2025 by talynt.org 77 views

Study of the Effectiveness of the Use of Volcanic Ash and Rice Husk Ash on Clay Stability in Terms of CBR Values and Unconfined Compression Tests

Introduction

Clay soil is one of the most widely used types of soil in the process of stabilization, particularly in construction applications. The addition of stabilizers, such as volcanic ash and rice husk ash, has been shown to improve the physical and mechanical properties of clay soil. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the use of volcanic ash and rice husk ash on the stability of clay soil, with a focus on California Bearing Ratio (CBR) values and unconfined compression tests.

The Nature and Classification of Clay Land

Clay soil is a type of soil that is composed of fine-grained particles, typically less than 0.002 mm in diameter. In this study, the clay used had a water content of 12.35%, specific gravity of 2.65, liquid limit of 46.73%, and plasticity index of 26.33%. Based on the classification of the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), the soil is classified as an inorganic clay with low to moderate plasticity (CL). Meanwhile, according to Aashto classification, the land is included in the A-7-6 category.

Mixed Variations and Test Methods

This study uses a mixed variation of 75% native soil, volcanic ash 2.5% to 25%, and rice husk ash 2.5% to 25% of the dry weight of the soil sample. The mixture of soil and stabilizers for 14 days gives sufficient time for the material interaction process. The results of the study show that the addition of volcanic ash significantly improves the physical and mechanical properties of clay soils.

The Effect of Volcanic Ash on Clay Soil

The addition of volcanic ash has been shown to improve the physical and mechanical properties of clay soil. Atterberg limits value decreases after the stabilization process. The soil plasticity index is reduced from 26.33% to 5.31% in a mixture of 2.5% volcanic ash and 22.5% of rice husk ash. The results of the study also show that the addition of 25% of volcanic ash causes an increase in the compressive strength of the soil, from 1.38 kg/cm² to 2.23 kg/cm².

The Effect of Rice Husk Ash on Clay Soil

However, the use of rice husk ash in this mixture is not very recommended, given the less significant results in improving the nature of the soil. This indicates that not all stabilizers have the same effectiveness in increasing soil stability. The results of the study show that the addition of rice husk ash does not significantly improve the physical and mechanical properties of clay soil.

Results and Discussion

The analysis of the mechanical properties of the soil shows the optimal value of the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) in the 75% soil mixture and 25% of volcanic ash, with a CBR value of 15.48%. This finding indicates that volcanic ash acts as an effective stabilizer to improve the quality of clay soils. The addition of 25% of volcanic ash also causes an increase in the compressive strength of the soil, from 1.38 kg/cm² to 2.23 kg/cm².

Conclusion

Stabilization of clay soil using volcanic ash shows positive results, improving the physical and mechanical properties of the soil. A good CBR value and an increase in the compressive strength of the soil provide evidence that volcanic ash is the right choice as a stabilizer. This study emphasizes the importance of the selection of proper stabilizers to improve soil performance in construction applications, as well as open opportunities for further research in the use of waste materials that have the potential to stabilize soil.

Recommendations

Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations are made:

The use of volcanic ash as a stabilizer in clay soil is recommended, given its effectiveness in improving the physical and mechanical properties of the soil.
Further research is needed to investigate the use of other waste materials as stabilizers in clay soil.
The selection of proper stabilizers is crucial in improving soil performance in construction applications.
The use of rice husk ash as a stabilizer in clay soil is not recommended, given its less significant results in improving the nature of the soil.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

The study only investigated the use of volcanic ash and rice husk ash as stabilizers in clay soil.
The study only used a limited number of soil samples.
The study only investigated the physical and mechanical properties of the soil, and did not investigate other properties such as durability and resistance to erosion.

Future Research Directions

Future research directions include:

Investigating the use of other waste materials as stabilizers in clay soil.
Investigating the effect of different proportions of volcanic ash and rice husk ash on the physical and mechanical properties of clay soil.
Investigating the durability and resistance to erosion of clay soil stabilized with volcanic ash and rice husk ash.

References

Aashto (2017). AASHTO LR 108: Standard Test Method for Determining the California Bearing Ratio of Soils.
ASTM (2017). ASTM D 422: Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Distribution of Soils by Sieving.
ASTM (2017). ASTM D 4318: Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils.
ASTM (2017). ASTM D 2166: Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soils.

Note: The references provided are a selection of the references used in the study, and are not an exhaustive list.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Study of the Effectiveness of the Use of Volcanic Ash and Rice Husk Ash on Clay Stability

Q: What is the purpose of this study?

A: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the use of volcanic ash and rice husk ash on the stability of clay soil, with a focus on California Bearing Ratio (CBR) values and unconfined compression tests.

Q: What are the benefits of using volcanic ash as a stabilizer in clay soil?

A: The addition of volcanic ash has been shown to improve the physical and mechanical properties of clay soil, including a decrease in Atterberg limits value and a reduction in soil plasticity index. Volcanic ash also causes an increase in the compressive strength of the soil.

Q: What are the limitations of using rice husk ash as a stabilizer in clay soil?

A: The use of rice husk ash in this mixture is not very recommended, given the less significant results in improving the nature of the soil. This indicates that not all stabilizers have the same effectiveness in increasing soil stability.

Q: What are the optimal proportions of volcanic ash and rice husk ash for improving the physical and mechanical properties of clay soil?

A: The optimal value of the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) is found in the 75% soil mixture and 25% of volcanic ash, with a CBR value of 15.48%. The addition of 25% of volcanic ash also causes an increase in the compressive strength of the soil, from 1.38 kg/cm² to 2.23 kg/cm².

Q: What are the implications of this study for construction applications?

A: This study emphasizes the importance of the selection of proper stabilizers to improve soil performance in construction applications. The use of volcanic ash as a stabilizer in clay soil is recommended, given its effectiveness in improving the physical and mechanical properties of the soil.

Q: What are the future research directions for this study?

A: Future research directions include investigating the use of other waste materials as stabilizers in clay soil, investigating the effect of different proportions of volcanic ash and rice husk ash on the physical and mechanical properties of clay soil, and investigating the durability and resistance to erosion of clay soil stabilized with volcanic ash and rice husk ash.

Q: What are the potential applications of this study?

A: The findings of this study can be applied to various construction projects, such as road construction, building construction, and foundation construction. The use of volcanic ash as a stabilizer in clay soil can also be applied to other industries, such as agriculture and environmental remediation.

Q: What are the potential risks associated with the use of volcanic ash and rice husk ash as stabilizers in clay soil?

A: The use of volcanic ash and rice husk ash as stabilizers in clay soil may pose some risks, such as the potential for environmental contamination and the potential for adverse health effects. However, these risks can be mitigated by proper handling and disposal of the materials.

Q: What are the potential benefits of using waste materials as stabilizers in clay soil?

A: The use of waste materials as stabilizers in clay soil can provide several benefits, including reducing waste disposal costs, reducing the need for virgin materials, and improving the sustainability of construction projects.

Q: What are the potential limitations of using waste materials as stabilizers in clay soil?

A: The use of waste materials as stabilizers in clay soil may pose some limitations, such as the potential for inconsistent quality and the potential for adverse environmental impacts. However, these limitations can be mitigated by proper selection and processing of the waste materials.

Q: What are the potential future applications of this study?

A: The findings of this study can be applied to various fields, such as civil engineering, environmental engineering, and materials science. The use of volcanic ash and rice husk ash as stabilizers in clay soil can also be applied to other industries, such as agriculture and environmental remediation.

Q: What are the potential future research directions for this study?