The Practice of Discourse and Commodification

Oct 13, 2025 by talynt.org 65 views

Media Power Relations in the Live Broadcast of Mirna's Murder Case on TVOne: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Introduction

The media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion and influencing the way people perceive the world around them. In the context of live broadcasts, the media has the power to create a certain narrative and frame the information in a way that is both informative and entertaining. This is particularly evident in the case of the Mirna murder trial, which was broadcast live on TVOne in Indonesia. This thesis aims to examine the media power relations in the live broadcast of the Mirna murder case on TVOne, with a focus on critical discourse analysis.

Background

The Mirna murder trial was a highly publicized case in Indonesia, with the trial being broadcast live on TVOne for several months. The trial was a complex and sensitive case, involving the murder of a young woman and the subsequent trial of the accused. The live broadcast of the trial on TVOne provided the public with direct access to information about the case, but it also raised questions about the responsibility of the media in delivering balanced and accurate news.

Methodology

This study used a qualitative approach, with a focus on critical discourse analysis. The critical paradigm and discourse analysis techniques developed by Norman Fairclough were used to analyze the data. The commodification theory of the media political economy proposed by Vincent Mosco and the post-structural post theory of Pierre Bourdieu were also used as analytical tools.

Analysis of Media Power Relations

The media relations of media in the context of live broadcasts in the murder of Mirna can be seen as a complex interaction between the media, the authorities, and the public. The media, as an agent of information disseminator, has the power to form public opinion and provide narratives that can affect public perception. In this case, TVOne, with a live broadcast, plays an important role in creating a certain point of view regarding the case.

The Practice of Discourse and Commodification

The practice of discourse in live broadcasts is not only limited to the delivery of facts, but also includes how the information is framed to form an interesting narrative. This is in line with the commodification theory which states that the media not only serves to convey information, but also to generate profits through the content they present. By broadcasting the Mirna case directly, TVOne not only provides information to the public, but also attracts advertising and sponsors, which in turn increases their income.

Impact on the Public

The impact of this live broadcast on the public also cannot be ignored. With continuous shows, people get direct access to information, but on the other hand, they can also be trapped in sensationalism and entertainment offered by the media. This leads to ethical questions about the responsibility of the media in delivering balanced and accurate news, especially in cases involving serious crimes such as murder.

The Role of TVOne in Shaping Public Opinion

TVOne, as a private television station, has a significant role in shaping public opinion in Indonesia. The live broadcast of the Mirna murder trial on TVOne provided the public with direct access to information about the case, but it also raised questions about the responsibility of the media in delivering balanced and accurate news. The media, as an agent of information disseminator, has the power to form public opinion and provide narratives that can affect public perception.

The Impact of Media Power Relations on Public Opinion

The media power relations in the live broadcast of the Mirna murder case on TVOne reflect the dynamics of media power, information commodification, and its impact on public opinion. By understanding the practice of discourse carried out by the media, we can be more critical in assessing the information presented, as well as aware of the important role of the media in forming narratives that affect the community.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study has shown that the media power relations in the live broadcast of the Mirna murder case on TVOne reflect the dynamics of media power, information commodification, and its impact on public opinion. The practice of discourse carried out by the media has a significant impact on public opinion, and it is essential to be aware of the important role of the media in forming narratives that affect the community. This research is expected to contribute to further understanding of the relationship between the media and power, as well as how both of them influence each other in the context of news in Indonesia.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

The media should be more responsible in delivering balanced and accurate news, especially in cases involving serious crimes such as murder.
The public should be more critical in assessing the information presented by the media, and be aware of the important role of the media in forming narratives that affect the community.
The government should establish regulations to ensure that the media is more responsible in delivering balanced and accurate news.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

The study only focused on the live broadcast of the Mirna murder trial on TVOne, and did not consider other media outlets.
The study only analyzed the discourse of the media, and did not consider the impact of other factors such as the audience and the social context.

Future Research Directions

Future research should consider the following directions:

Conducting a comparative study of the media power relations in different media outlets.
Analyzing the impact of other factors such as the audience and the social context on media power relations.
Examining the role of social media in shaping public opinion and influencing media power relations.

References

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
Mosco, V. (1996). The Political Economy of Communication. Sage Publications.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press.

Appendix

The appendix includes the following:

The list of participants in the study.
The coding scheme used in the analysis.
The raw data used in the analysis.

Note: The references and appendix are not included in the word count.
Q&A: Media Power Relations in the Live Broadcast of Mirna's Murder Case on TVOne

Introduction

The live broadcast of the Mirna murder trial on TVOne in Indonesia sparked a lot of debate and discussion about the role of the media in shaping public opinion. In this Q&A article, we will answer some of the most frequently asked questions about the media power relations in the live broadcast of the Mirna murder case on TVOne.

Q: What is media power relations?

A: Media power relations refer to the way in which the media influences public opinion and shapes the way people perceive the world around them. In the context of the live broadcast of the Mirna murder trial on TVOne, media power relations refer to the way in which the media presented the case and influenced public opinion.

Q: What was the purpose of the live broadcast of the Mirna murder trial on TVOne?

A: The purpose of the live broadcast of the Mirna murder trial on TVOne was to provide the public with direct access to information about the case. However, the live broadcast also raised questions about the responsibility of the media in delivering balanced and accurate news.

Q: How did the media present the Mirna murder case on TVOne?

A: The media presented the Mirna murder case on TVOne in a way that was both informative and entertaining. The live broadcast included interviews with the accused, the victim's family, and other key players in the case. The media also presented the case in a way that was sensational and attention-grabbing.

Q: What was the impact of the live broadcast of the Mirna murder trial on TVOne on public opinion?

A: The live broadcast of the Mirna murder trial on TVOne had a significant impact on public opinion. Many people were shocked and outraged by the details of the case, and the live broadcast helped to fuel public debate and discussion about the case.

Q: What are the implications of the media power relations in the live broadcast of the Mirna murder case on TVOne?

A: The implications of the media power relations in the live broadcast of the Mirna murder case on TVOne are significant. The media has a significant influence on public opinion, and the way in which the media presents information can shape the way people perceive the world around them. In the context of the Mirna murder case, the media power relations highlight the need for the media to be more responsible in delivering balanced and accurate news.

Q: What can be done to improve media power relations in the live broadcast of high-profile cases like the Mirna murder trial?

A: There are several things that can be done to improve media power relations in the live broadcast of high-profile cases like the Mirna murder trial. These include:

Ensuring that the media is more responsible in delivering balanced and accurate news.
Providing the public with more information about the case, including the details of the trial and the evidence presented.
Encouraging the media to be more critical and nuanced in its reporting of the case.
Providing the public with more opportunities to engage with the media and provide feedback on its reporting.

Q: What are the future implications of the media power relations in the live broadcast of the Mirna murder case on TVOne?

A: The future implications of the media power relations in the live broadcast of the Mirna murder case on TVOne are significant. The media will continue to play a significant role in shaping public opinion, and the way in which the media presents information will continue to influence the way people perceive the world around them. In the context of the Mirna murder case, the media power relations highlight the need for the media to be more responsible in delivering balanced and accurate news.

Conclusion

The live broadcast of the Mirna murder trial on TVOne highlights the significant influence of the media on public opinion. The media power relations in the live broadcast of the Mirna murder case on TVOne raise important questions about the responsibility of the media in delivering balanced and accurate news. By understanding the media power relations in the live broadcast of the Mirna murder case on TVOne, we can better appreciate the complex and nuanced role of the media in shaping public opinion.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is media power relations? A: Media power relations refer to the way in which the media influences public opinion and shapes the way people perceive the world around them.
Q: What was the purpose of the live broadcast of the Mirna murder trial on TVOne? A: The purpose of the live broadcast of the Mirna murder trial on TVOne was to provide the public with direct access to information about the case.
Q: How did the media present the Mirna murder case on TVOne? A: The media presented the Mirna murder case on TVOne in a way that was both informative and entertaining.
Q: What was the impact of the live broadcast of the Mirna murder trial on TVOne on public opinion? A: The live broadcast of the Mirna murder trial on TVOne had a significant impact on public opinion.
Q: What are the implications of the media power relations in the live broadcast of the Mirna murder case on TVOne? A: The implications of the media power relations in the live broadcast of the Mirna murder case on TVOne are significant.

References

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
Mosco, V. (1996). The Political Economy of Communication. Sage Publications.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press.

Appendix

The appendix includes the following:

The list of participants in the study.
The coding scheme used in the analysis.
The raw data used in the analysis.